http://www.davedevelopment.co.uk/2009/02/25/how-protected-is-protected/ Dave Marshall Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:00:11 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://www.davedevelopment.co.uk/2009/02/25/how-protected-is-protected/comment-page-1/#comment-78769 Parahat Melayev Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:42:02 +0000 http://www.davedevelopment.co.uk/2009/02/23/of-visibility-encapsulation-and-inheritance/#comment-78769 As this is a banking application be aware that Ruby's MRI (interpreter) had some serious vulnerabilities until v1.9. Please see http://www.matasano.com/log/1070/updates-on-drew-yaos-terrible-ruby-vulnerabilities/ As this is a banking application be aware that Ruby’s MRI (interpreter) had some serious vulnerabilities until v1.9. Please see http://www.matasano.com/log/1070/updates-on-drew-yaos-terrible-ruby-vulnerabilities/

]]> http://www.davedevelopment.co.uk/2009/02/25/how-protected-is-protected/comment-page-1/#comment-76146 DivineDominion Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:31:47 +0000 http://www.davedevelopment.co.uk/2009/02/23/of-visibility-encapsulation-and-inheritance/#comment-76146 Sounds pretty strange. As I seem to know from past Java experience, <code>protected</code> attributes are like <code>private</code> attributes (access limited to the instance in its class-scoop) only <code>protected</code> ones will be inherited. Why should I want to grant inheritable access by class and not by instance? <code>protected static</code> attributes should do that. Sounds pretty strange. As I seem to know from past Java experience, protected attributes are like private attributes (access limited to the instance in its class-scoop) only protected ones will be inherited. Why should I want to grant inheritable access by class and not by instance? protected static attributes should do that.

]]>